You need to sign in or subscribe to read more articles

Subscribe and get unlimited access to our complete archive

Subscribe

Ittakes about ten minutes to walk from Birmingham New Street Station to the Ikon Gallery, which occupies one of the few Victorian buildings to have survived the redevelopment of the city centre. Above the excellent café and a shop, the white walls of the first floor, where contemporary art is normally displayed, are at present devoted to Carlo Crivelli (until 29 May). Most of the paintings have been borrowed from the National Gallery but there are major loans from elsewhere, including an exquisite panel from the Victoria and Albert Museum and the central panel of a grand altarpiece now kept in the Vatican Museum.

Among the loans from the National Gallery is the Annunciation (1486), one of the best-loved Renaissance paintings in London, in which Crivelli exhibited his knowledge of linear perspective in the recession of bricks and ashlar and the foreshortened apertures of a distant dovecote, and demonstrated his familiarity with the revival of ancient Roman ornament in the gilded Corinthian capitals and the terracotta relief of putti. But the impossibly elongated fingers of his Madonnas here and elsewhere reveal an attachment to late Gothic ideals, and the pierced and crocketed frames surviving on some of his polyptychs are spectacular examples of Gothic architecture. Crivelli seems to belong to two worlds.

He was not alone, in the final decades of the 15th century, in often retaining gilded backgrounds, but he had no rivals in decorating the gold with sharply incised and minutely punched patterns. He was also unusually skilled in building up the gesso ground of his panels into low relief, using the technique of ‘piping’ which is now only employed for embellishing the icing on a cake. He chose patterns that were difficult to render with the bladder and quill he must have used, giving the Virgin in the V&A’s panel a robe embroidered with long-beaked, long-tailed, long-winged birds, where the numerous fine raised lines often taper to a point. These are phoenixes which have migrated from Chinese textiles. Amanda Hilliam, in the excellent catalogue entry for this painting, likens the effect of this relief to that of the press-moulded silver foil which is a feature of many Byzantine icons, illustrating one from the 13th century in the cathedral of Fermo.* Such ‘Greek’ images, not all of them old, were found in many, perhaps most, homes of moderate affluence in Crivelli’s native Venice.

‘The Vision of the Blessed Gabriele’ (c.1489)

‘The Vision of the Blessed Gabriele’ (c.1489)

Please sign in or subscribe to read the full article.

Sign in

Send Letters To:

The Editor
London Review of Books,
28 Little Russell Street
London, WC1A 2HN

letters@lrb.co.uk

Please include name, address, and a telephone number.

Letters

Vol. 44 No. 9 · 12 May 2022

Nicholas Penny’s review of the Carlo Crivelli exhibition at Birmingham’s Ikon Gallery doesn’t mention that around a third of the exhibition space is dedicated to works by the contemporary artist Susan Collis (LRB, 7 April). As you move through the exhibition space, Crivelli’s works momentarily give way to a portion of the room that seemingly isn’t yet ready for visitors, or is in the midst of maintenance. Two screws suggest that a painting is yet to be hung; a paint-splattered dustsheet lies nearby; a broom and overalls rest opposite. Accompanying labels reveal that these apparently mundane objects are in fact works by Collis, which have been painstakingly recreated using expensive materials. The paint splatters on the overalls are in fact delicate embroidery; the screws are hallmarked white gold, set with sapphires; the white paint in the bristles of the broom are finest pearls, and so on. Both Collis and Crivelli seek to deceive the eye; Collis’s works prompted double takes from visitors. Penny’s omission is surprising given that he pays close attention to trompe l’oeil in Crivelli’s work, admiring the ‘trickery of his reliefs’ and noting that the representation of flies apparently on the surface of the painting invites us ‘to think about the nature of art and illusion’. His concluding comments go further: ‘This is a welcome change after a quarter of a century of intrusive interventions by contemporary artists in major collections of Old Masters.’ To our mind, this is a genuinely successful – and not at all glib – attempt at transhistorical curation that extends beyond the idea of ‘influence’. Perhaps Penny simply fell for Collis’s illusion.

Flora Clark and Oliver Evans
London SW4

send letters to

The Editor
London Review of Books
28 Little Russell Street
London, WC1A 2HN

letters@lrb.co.uk

Please include name, address and a telephone number

Read anywhere with the London Review of Books app, available now from the App Store for Apple devices, Google Play for Android devices and Amazon for your Kindle Fire.

Sign up to our newsletter

For highlights from the latest issue, our archive and the blog, as well as news, events and exclusive promotions.

Newsletter Preferences