John Tranter, 1 July 1999
“... To her the kissing group of husbands and wives was like a gang of schoolgirls in the laundry, all fuss and bother, no proper theory of how sexuality is conditioned by the economic strictures of society and not by the games shows and the sporting programmes or by the lies that stain the pages of cheap paper, for example, when her friends told her she was a rotten writer plumping up the pillow of her conventional emotions so she could feel in love temporarily click on click off and revel in a moody air in the kitchen, scribbling diary entries as though they were great roiling thoughts or worse, riveting literature meant to be read out during the long night of the adult education course training tapping dogs to do the new job, it’s obviously made for love, this mechanical device with its ribbon spooling out reams of confectionery and duplicity that young women desperately want to believe could happen to them, like doctors who are stern and rich – no, will happen to them – and the pretty nurses who are young and whimpering, but somehow dazzling, the same story, only glowing with a more literary quality – what the fuck – now it happens, only the ending is wrong, and the hero, called Kevin or Duane, is a loser – there are no doctors here, they live elsewhere with their wives, their investments, and their matched pairs of children ...”