Jamboree
John Sturrock, 20 February 1986
Handbook of Russian Literature
edited by Victor Terras.
Yale, 558 pp., £25, April 1985,0 300 03155 6 Show More
edited by Victor Terras.
Yale, 558 pp., £25, April 1985,
Verbal Art, Verbal Sign, Verbal Time
by Roman Jakobson, edited by Krystyna Pomorska and Stephen Rudy.
Blackwell, 208 pp., £25, July 1985,0 631 14262 2 Show More
by Roman Jakobson, edited by Krystyna Pomorska and Stephen Rudy.
Blackwell, 208 pp., £25, July 1985,
Historic Structures: The Prague School Project 1928-1946
by F.W. Galan.
Croom Helm, 250 pp., £22.50, May 1985,0 7099 3816 0 Show More
by F.W. Galan.
Croom Helm, 250 pp., £22.50, May 1985,
Mikhail Bakhtin
by Katerina Clark and Michael Holquist.
Harvard, 398 pp., £19.95, February 1985,0 674 57416 8 Show More
by Katerina Clark and Michael Holquist.
Harvard, 398 pp., £19.95, February 1985,
The Formal Method in Literary Scholarship: A Critical Introduction to Sociological Poetics
by M.M. Bakhtin and P.M. Medvedev, translated by Albert Wehrle.
Harvard, 191 pp., £7.50, May 1985,0 674 30921 9 Show More
by M.M. Bakhtin and P.M. Medvedev, translated by Albert Wehrle.
Harvard, 191 pp., £7.50, May 1985,
Dialogues between Roman Jakobson and Krystyna Pomorska
translated by Christian Hubert.
Cambridge, 186 pp., £15, August 1983,0 521 25113 3 Show More
translated by Christian Hubert.
Cambridge, 186 pp., £15, August 1983,
The Dialogical Principle
by Tzvetan Todorov, translated by Wlad Godzich.
Manchester, 132 pp., £25, February 1985,0 7190 1466 2 Show More
by Tzvetan Todorov, translated by Wlad Godzich.
Manchester, 132 pp., £25, February 1985,
Rabelais and his World
by Mikhail Bakhtin, translated by Hélène Iswolsky.
Indiana, 484 pp., $29.50, August 1984,0 253 20341 4 Show More
by Mikhail Bakhtin, translated by Hélène Iswolsky.
Indiana, 484 pp., $29.50, August 1984,
“... him. He is to be met with in querulous vein, talking over his life and ideas with the ever-present Pomorska, in the useful Dialogues, where he at one moment ‘regrets having to say that the specific objections of my critics plainly reveal insufficient familiarity with even the most elementary questions involved in an analysis of linguistic ... ”
