After Foucault
David Hoy, 1 November 1984
Philosophy in France Today
edited by Alan Montefiore.
Cambridge, 201 pp., £20, January 1983,0 521 22838 7 Show More
edited by Alan Montefiore.
Cambridge, 201 pp., £20, January 1983,
French Literary Theory Today: A Reader
edited by Tzvetan Todorov, translated by R. Carter.
Cambridge, 239 pp., £19.50, October 1982,0 521 23036 5 Show More
edited by Tzvetan Todorov, translated by R. Carter.
Cambridge, 239 pp., £19.50, October 1982,
Histoire de la Sexualité. Vol. II: L’Usage des Plaisirs
by Michel Foucault.
Gallimard, 285 pp., £8.25, June 1984,2 07 070056 9 Show More
by Michel Foucault.
Gallimard, 285 pp., £8.25, June 1984,
Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
by Hubert Dreyfus and Paul Rabinow.
Chicago, 256 pp., $8.95, December 1983,0 226 16312 1 Show More
by Hubert Dreyfus and Paul Rabinow.
Chicago, 256 pp., $8.95, December 1983,
The Foucault Reader
edited by Paul Rabinow.
Pantheon, 350 pp., $19.95, January 1985,0 394 52904 9 Show More
edited by Paul Rabinow.
Pantheon, 350 pp., $19.95, January 1985,
Michel Foucault and the Subversion of Intellect
by Karlis Racevskis.
Cornell, 172 pp., £16.50, July 1983,0 8014 1572 1 Show More
by Karlis Racevskis.
Cornell, 172 pp., £16.50, July 1983,
Michel Foucault’s Archaeology of Western Culture: Toward a New Science of History
by Pamela Major-Poetzl.
Harvester, 281 pp., £22.50, May 1983,0 7108 0484 9 Show More
by Pamela Major-Poetzl.
Harvester, 281 pp., £22.50, May 1983,
Michel Foucault: Social Theory as Transgression
by Charles Lemert and Garth Gillan.
Columbia, 169 pp., £8.50, January 1984,0 231 05190 5 Show More
by Charles Lemert and Garth Gillan.
Columbia, 169 pp., £8.50, January 1984,
Foucault, Marxism and Critique
by Barry Smart.
Routledge, 144 pp., £5.95, September 1983,0 7100 9533 3 Show More
by Barry Smart.
Routledge, 144 pp., £5.95, September 1983,
“... own are those by Karlis Racevskis, Pamela Major-Poetzl, and the co-authors, Charles Lemert and Garth Gillan. These books represent interestingly different ways of interpreting Foucault’s work, but by attempting this while Foucault was still productive, they knowingly ran the risk of becoming outdated. For those who think Foucault’s concept of ... ”
