After Foucault
David Hoy, 1 November 1984
Philosophy in France Today
edited by Alan Montefiore.
Cambridge, 201 pp., £20, January 1983,0 521 22838 7 Show More
edited by Alan Montefiore.
Cambridge, 201 pp., £20, January 1983,
French Literary Theory Today: A Reader
edited by Tzvetan Todorov, translated by R. Carter.
Cambridge, 239 pp., £19.50, October 1982,0 521 23036 5 Show More
edited by Tzvetan Todorov, translated by R. Carter.
Cambridge, 239 pp., £19.50, October 1982,
Histoire de la Sexualité. Vol. II: L’Usage des Plaisirs
by Michel Foucault.
Gallimard, 285 pp., £8.25, June 1984,2 07 070056 9 Show More
by Michel Foucault.
Gallimard, 285 pp., £8.25, June 1984,
Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
by Hubert Dreyfus and Paul Rabinow.
Chicago, 256 pp., $8.95, December 1983,0 226 16312 1 Show More
by Hubert Dreyfus and Paul Rabinow.
Chicago, 256 pp., $8.95, December 1983,
The Foucault Reader
edited by Paul Rabinow.
Pantheon, 350 pp., $19.95, January 1985,0 394 52904 9 Show More
edited by Paul Rabinow.
Pantheon, 350 pp., $19.95, January 1985,
Michel Foucault and the Subversion of Intellect
by Karlis Racevskis.
Cornell, 172 pp., £16.50, July 1983,0 8014 1572 1 Show More
by Karlis Racevskis.
Cornell, 172 pp., £16.50, July 1983,
Michel Foucault’s Archaeology of Western Culture: Toward a New Science of History
by Pamela Major-Poetzl.
Harvester, 281 pp., £22.50, May 1983,0 7108 0484 9 Show More
by Pamela Major-Poetzl.
Harvester, 281 pp., £22.50, May 1983,
Michel Foucault: Social Theory as Transgression
by Charles Lemert and Garth Gillan.
Columbia, 169 pp., £8.50, January 1984,0 231 05190 5 Show More
by Charles Lemert and Garth Gillan.
Columbia, 169 pp., £8.50, January 1984,
Foucault, Marxism and Critique
by Barry Smart.
Routledge, 144 pp., £5.95, September 1983,0 7100 9533 3 Show More
by Barry Smart.
Routledge, 144 pp., £5.95, September 1983,
“... Existentialist era had dwindled, and that phase of his philosophical work had been absorbed. Like Jacques Lacan’s death, however, Foucault’s comes at a point where debate has not settled the question of either the viability of his vision or the importance of the Post-Structuralist period. Foucault’s life, like Merleau-Ponty’s, ended ... ”