In Knock
Rachel Andrews
Father Brian McKevitt delivered the homily at Knock Basilica in County Mayo on Sunday. The service was billed as an All Ireland Act of Reparation, a communal act of repentance on behalf of those of us who voted Yes in the referendum on 25 May. Ireland, Fr McKevitt said, has become a ‘pro-choice’ society, where people have decided that either God does not exist or is irrelevant, and are making their own decisions about what is right or wrong. ‘I will go to Mass on Sunday, if I choose,’ he said. ‘I will stay with my spouse, if I choose. I will look after my children, if I choose. I will marry a person of the same sex, if I choose. I will even end the life of an unborn child, if I choose.’
The basilica, which has a capacity of around 10,000, was by no means full, but the congregation was substantial, and of all ages. Many clutched rosary beads. In front of me, a woman nodded as the priest said that ‘feel-good Catholicism’ has taken hold in Ireland to such an extent that mass-goers now ‘think that they can vote for a shocking evil and then think that they can go to Holy Communion the next day without any repentance’.
I am too young to remember the reaction 35 years ago from those who opposed the introduction of the Eighth Amendment to the Constitution, which gave a foetus equal rights with a pregnant woman and Ireland one of the strictest abortion regimes in the world. But anecdotally they have spoken of the great silence that took place in its aftermath, when the word abortion could no longer be mentioned. Those who voted this year to keep the Eighth, and lost, may feel crushed, but they do not appear to feel silenced.
A radio reporter who covered one of the counts in Dublin said he had seen a young No campaigner in floods of tears. Breda O’Brien, a No campaigner and columnist for the Irish Times, wrote that it was impossible to describe the ‘alienation and horror’ that No voters felt in response to their fellow citizens’ ‘decision to remove the Eighth Amendment and to watch some of them singing and dancing in celebration’. Kathy Sinnott, a former MEP and disability advocate who was involved in organising the Reparation mass, said that those who campaigned against the referendum are grieving; for them, 25 May is known as ‘Black Friday’.
Since the end of May, there have been both civil and uncivil acts opposing the result of the vote. ‘The resistance begins now,’ O’Brien wrote in her first column after the referendum. ‘I am honoured to count myself among you.’ Rónán Mullen, a prominent anti-abortion senator, has formed a new political party, the Human Dignity Alliance. The Irish Centre for Bio-Ethical Reform continues to hold up large banners of dismembered foetuses outside maternity hospitals; the government has said that exclusion zones will be part of the new abortion legislation. The pop-up Yes campaign office in Cork city was recently defaced with red paint.
Many on the pro-life side are young, and they do not lack funds. In 2016, the Iona Institute, a religious advocacy group headed by David Quinn, a Sunday Times columnist, received donations of almost €275,000. Expectant Mother Care, a US anti-abortion group, has apparently offered to fly 20 Irish activists to New York this summer to train them in ‘pavement counselling’, which targets women on their way into hospitals or clinics.
Next month, Pope Francis will visit Ireland. When John Paul II came in 1979, there was a revival of religious fervour. That is unlikely this time, but the pope’s trip will no doubt offer another opportunity for a call to arms. Ending his homily, Fr McKevitt reassured those who may be feeling despair that they are the ones with ‘the truth’, while the secularists offer only emptiness and despair. ‘Isn’t it great to be a Catholic?’ he asked. ‘It is the most wonderful thing in the world.’
Comments
While such appeals to experience at the University of Life, having had enough of experts, etc, are inherently poor positions from which to argue I do feel that our difference here- empiricism versus logical purity?- is a major source of philosophical debate and one which I am definitely not equipped to pursue. I do think that my practical experiences as a Catholic schoolteacher and parent justify me in making that connection between monks' and priests' claim of moral authority over abortion and the morality of their reactions to child abuse taking place among themselves. My original point was that Father McKevitt's judgement appeared to be clouded. While not in itself invalidating the Church's position, it does call into question its representation and application by its human agents, surely?
And I don't attempt to claim that the moral authority for my judgement on the Church's hypocrisy rests on majority opinion. My intended implication was that if the Church wanted to survive, it needed to listen to those whose spiritual and moral government it claims. I am sorry for not having made myself clearer.
There is, as this Church of overwhelmingly elderly white men knows better than anyone, no such thing as a pro-life movement; the bloody history of Catholicism makes it quite plain that the Vatican has been perfectly happy to commit the bloodiest of slaughters to protect its brand-monopoly on christianity - the Vatican's attitude from time immemorial has *not* been 'protect all life as sacred', if not "Caedite eos! Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius!" Kill them all, for the Lord God shall know his own, as the Dominicans instructed at the massacre of Beziers in 1209.
Pro-choice does exactly what it says on the tin, whereas, as the series of Lancet research pieces shows beyond the shadow of a doubt, countries which make abortion illegal do not experience a drop in the numbers of abortions, those abortions simply go underground, abroad, and the amount of death, pain and suffering attached to them sky-rockets.
Which is exacty what the Catholic Church wants - control of the pain and suffering inherent in life, birth and death has been a business model of immense profitability over centuries; the more sin and suffering you can attach to the complicated business of living and dying, the more money you can make out of 'the remission of sins'.
So by all means, go campaign and pretend you're pro-life, as they do in the USA until that life grows old enough to shoot; carry pictures of suffering foetuses if it makes you feel good about yourself. The Vatican accountants are cackling with glee and rubbing their hands in anticipation...
These are not just past sins. The scandal - the tragedy - in Spain which began under Franco, the stealing of babies and toddlers from Republicans to give to childless Falangists, continued after his death, as nuns falsely told mothers their babies had died in chidbirth, and then sold them on to make money for the church, continued up until very recent times, and may still be happening, as nuns/nurses judge whether a mother is 'worthy' to have a child, legitimate or not.
The Church works by making its followers feel guilt, but it would appear this is not an emotion felt by priests and nuns for their cruelty.