Philosophy & Law

Judge John Donaldson

Judicial Activism

Francis FitzGibbon

23 April 2026

It isn’t controversial to expect courts to be politically neutral when deciding cases that have great political impact, and it is all too easy for the losing side to ascribe political bias to the judge. Finding proof that the judge’s personal or political views have determined a decision is harder, in the UK at least.

Read more about Short Cuts: Judicial Activism

In Court and on the Road

James Lasdun

23 April 2026

The idea​ of a road trip organised around trials and hearings at courthouses across the US had been in my head for years. Last autumn I found myself in a position to make it a reality. I had a month . . .

The Dangerous Dead

Mike Jay

19 February 2026

The​ word ‘vampire’ entered common parlance in the Anglophone world in 1732, as sensational reports arrived via German newspapers about an episode on the Serbian front in the wars between the Habsburg . . .

Character Types

Colin Burrow

19 February 2026

What do we mean​ when we call someone a ‘character’? It’s often a way of indicating that a person habitually says or does things that most people wouldn’t say or do. It might be that the character . . .

Milton’s Theology

Tobias Gregory

19 February 2026

Acelebrated 17th-century​ poet composes, over many years, his own eccentric version of Christian theology. Along the way he becomes blind, and so dictates the work to scribes, with additions, revisions . . .

Diary: When I Met the Pope

Patricia Lockwood, 30 November 2023

The invitation​ said ‘black dress for Ladies’. ‘You’re not allowed to be whiter than him,’ my husband, Jason, instructs. ‘He has to be the whitest. And you cannot wear a hat because that is his thing.’

Read more about Diary: When I Met the Pope

Bantu in the Bathroom

Jacqueline Rose, 19 November 2015

Pistorius was surely not aware that when he insisted the person he shot in the bathroom was an intruder he was re-enacting one strand of his nation’s cruellest past.

Read more about Bantu in the Bathroom

The Adulteress Wife: Beauvoir Misrepresented

Toril Moi, 11 February 2010

In June 1946 Simone de Beauvoir was 38. She had just finished The Ethics of Ambiguity, and was wondering what to write next. Urged by Jean Genet, she went to see the Lady and the Unicorn...

Read more about The Adulteress Wife: Beauvoir Misrepresented

Where is my mind?

Jerry Fodor, 12 February 2009

If there’s anything we philosophers really hate it’s an untenable dualism. Exposing untenable dualisms is a lot of what we do for a living. It’s no small job, I assure you. They...

Read more about Where is my mind?

Lunging, Flailing, Mispunching: Richard Dawkins

Terry Eagleton, 19 October 2006

Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology....

Read more about Lunging, Flailing, Mispunching: Richard Dawkins

No, it’s not anti-semitic: the right to criticise Israel

Judith Butler, 21 August 2003

Profoundly anti-Israel views are increasingly finding support in progressive intellectual communities. Serious and thoughtful people are advocating and taking actions that are anti-semitic in...

Read more about No, it’s not anti-semitic: the right to criticise Israel

You can’t build a new society with a Stanley knife: Hardt and Negri’s Empire

Malcolm Bull, 4 October 2001

Forget Bob Geldof, Bono and the other do-gooders, Genoa’s only significance was as the latest battle in the war of Neoliberalism. It was a clear victory this time for the...

Read more about You can’t build a new society with a Stanley knife: Hardt and Negri’s Empire

Why anything? Why this?

Derek Parfit, 22 January 1998

It might have been true that nothing ever existed: no living beings, no stars, no atoms, not even space or time. When we think about this possibility, it can seem astonishing that anything exists.

Read more about Why anything? Why this?

Subduing the jury

E.P. Thompson, 4 December 1986

It was nice to be awoken on 12 November by the BBC informing us that the Queen’s Speech would announce measures ‘to strengthen the jury system’. It is, after all, a very ancient...

Read more about Subduing the jury

Now and Then: Living in Time

Thomas Nagel, 5 February 2026

Our lives don’t just play out over time: we lead them over the course of that time, shaping them as an extended whole, remembering and reacting to the past, anticipating, planning and creating the future....

Read more about Now and Then: Living in Time

Good Failures: With a Whimper

Geoff Mann, 22 January 2026

Does anything matter if we’re done for? We are not the first to wonder. Contemporary fictions are preoccupied with apocalypse, human extinction and cataclysm, but this is nothing new. Secular eschatology...

Read more about Good Failures: With a Whimper

Schopenhauer has long held the title of gloomiest philosopher in history. He sees human existence not as grand tragedy but squalid farce, with men and women writhing in the grip of appetites that are both...

Read more about Pregnant with Monsters: Schopenhauer makes a stir

Nutshell Crime Scenes: The Rape Kit

Tess Little, 20 November 2025

The​ rape kit is a cardboard box containing ordinary items anyone might own: envelopes, combs, swabs, nail clippers. But the packaging together of these things in Chicago in the 1970s enabled the standardisation...

Read more about Nutshell Crime Scenes: The Rape Kit

God’s existence could be proved, Moses Maimonides thought, regardless of what we conclude about the eternity of the universe. If the universe isn’t eternal, then God must exist, because God is the...

Read more about Five Hundred Parasangs: Maimonides works it out

Self-Interpreting Animals

Stephen Mulhall, 9 October 2025

New linguistic articulations can reconfigure the way we make sense of our own feelings, thoughts and responses – our internalised self-interpretations. And what is true of our most basic feelings and...

Read more about Self-Interpreting Animals

The Supreme Court is quietly editing the Human Rights Act out of existence. None of this is being done in secret – the judgments are public – but the changes have barely registered. Judges, whether...

Read more about Unwelcome Remnant: Erasing the Human Rights Act

Short Cuts: Why Juries Matter

Francis FitzGibbon, 11 September 2025

In this country, trial by jury is constitutive of a fair, credible, legitimate system of criminal justice. It is what gives legitimacy to the state’s extensive powers of coercion over wrongdoers. At...

Read more about Short Cuts: Why Juries Matter

With the proscription of Palestine Action early in July, the question of what support for a terrorist group means has become urgent. Very few people in Britain supported al-Qaida; many more support the...

Read more about Short Cuts: What is the meaning of support?

The trials of Constance Marten and Mark Gordon were held to determine their criminal responsibility for their daughter’s death, not larger moral questions. And since the precise cause of death was impossible...

Read more about The Price of Safety: Constance Marten’s Defiance

I believe there is a moral case for disarming the machinery of war that is killing innocent civilians in Gaza with the complicity of the British government. I believe that damaging and destroying weapons...

Read more about Short Cuts: Who’s afraid of Palestine Action?

Short Cuts: On Pope Francis

James Butler, 8 May 2025

Francis’s continual emphasis on mercy – ‘the first attribute of God’ – explains his papal choices more clearly than the progressive/conservative heuristic. It is the reason he wanted a church...

Read more about Short Cuts: On Pope Francis

When I told people I was going to Guantánamo Bay last September to observe the trial of the 9/11 hijackers, I was met with bemusement. Even the lawyers I spoke to seemed surprised that there were still...

Read more about Short Cuts: Detained in Guantánamo

This Is Wrong: Executive Order 14168

Judith Butler, 3 April 2025

When diversity, equity and inclusion become ‘threats’ to the order of society, progressive politics in general is held responsible for every social ill. The result, as we have seen in recent years,...

Read more about This Is Wrong: Executive Order 14168

Hair-splitting: Versions of Marx

Peter E. Gordon, 3 April 2025

Marx meant Capital to read as if it were a pedagogical exercise in dispelling illusion, penetrating the veil that bourgeois economists had draped over a system that depends on the exploitation of labour...

Read more about Hair-splitting: Versions of Marx

On the horizon is a legally unfettered behemoth capable of coercing organisations, negating rights, suppressing speech and reshaping the economy and society of the United States – all at the whim of...

Read more about Short Cuts: Executive Hyperactivity

Rob, Kill and Burn: Massacre in Damascus

Youssef Ben Ismail, 6 March 2025

In the summer ​of 1860, an unprecedented wave of sectarian violence swept across Greater Syria. The massacre has long been studied but its causes remain misunderstood. Muslims, Jews and Christians of...

Read more about Rob, Kill and Burn: Massacre in Damascus

Christ himself made barely any pronouncements condemning sexuality. This has not stood in the way of Church authorities' lavish condemnation of all sorts of human desire.

Read more about Take a Cold Bath: Chastity or Fornication?

Read anywhere with the London Review of Books app, available now from the App Store for Apple devices, Google Play for Android devices and Amazon for your Kindle Fire.

Sign up to our newsletter

For highlights from the latest issue, our archive and the blog, as well as news, events and exclusive promotions.

Newsletter Preferences